---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/dauzj1f2ni/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-45l/nvxvhyiyq0/ortlieb-atrack-bp/"
title: "Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs Ortlieb Atrack BP"
description: "Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs Ortlieb Atrack BP: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/dauzj1f2ni/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-45l/nvxvhyiyq0/ortlieb-atrack-bp/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs. Ortlieb Atrack BP

# Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs. Ortlieb Atrack BP

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/dauzj1f2ni/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-45l/)

by [Patagonia](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Patagonia)

![Front facing view of the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1633531847/carryons/Cragsmith_Pack_45L_i4buem.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>45 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.559 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>60×27×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$199</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L | Feature | Ortlieb Atrack BP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| Y | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 0 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| Y | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| N | Laptop | N |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% polyester</td><td>PS21R</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Ortlieb Atrack BP](https://onebag.travel/carryon/nvxvhyiyq0/ortlieb-atrack-bp/)

by [Ortlieb](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Ortlieb)

![Front facing view of the Ortlieb Atrack BP](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1630938216/carryons/Atrack_BP_c8wk5x.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×26×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$250</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 31 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L, and 20 accept only the Ortlieb Atrack BP.

### Only the Ortlieb Atrack BP fits

Aegean Airlines, Air Astana, Air Nostrum, Atlas Global, British Airways, Copa Airlines, EL AL, Finnair, Great Lakes Airlines, Iran Aseman Air, Jet2, Kuwait Air, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Onur Air, Spirit Airlines, Thai Airways, Travel Service Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, WOW Airlines.

## Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs. Ortlieb Atrack BP: which should you pack?

The **Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L** carries 20L more than the **Ortlieb Atrack BP** (45L vs. 25L), while the **Ortlieb Atrack BP** is the lighter pack at 1.3kg (vs. 1.559kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Ortlieb Atrack BP** fits 27% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L; if you want to travel lighter, the Ortlieb Atrack BP is the better call.