---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/cb7ihqmtrf/hill-people-gear-tarahumara/we8jc3v3uo/stm-grace/"
title: "Hill People Gear Tarahumara versus STM Grace - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Hill People Gear Tarahumara and STM Grace carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/cb7ihqmtrf/hill-people-gear-tarahumara/we8jc3v3uo/stm-grace/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Hill People Gear Tarahumara vs. STM Grace

# Hill People Gear Tarahumara vs. STM Grace

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Hill People Gear Tarahumara](https://onebag.travel/carryon/cb7ihqmtrf/hill-people-gear-tarahumara/)

by [Hill People Gear](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Hill People Gear)

![Front facing view of the Hill People Gear Tarahumara](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601599547/carryons/hillpeoplehama_vpq4ho.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>16 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>43×23×10 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>96%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$175</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Hill People Gear Tarahumara | Feature | STM Grace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 4 |
| back | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| removable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| N | Laptop | 15in |
| 2 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2, side | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>500d Cordura</td><td>100% polyester</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [STM Grace](https://onebag.travel/carryon/we8jc3v3uo/stm-grace/)

by [Stm](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Stm)

![Front facing view of the STM Grace](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1634044887/carryons/STM_Grace_s3y2s6.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.6 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>42×29×11 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$100</td></tr></tbody></table>

Carry-on backpacks are versatile travel staples, combining portability with storage capacity. Today, let's talk about two backpacks: the Hill People Gear Tarahumara and the STM Grace. The Tarahumara packs a punch with 16 liters of capacity crammed into a relatively svelte 0.7-pound package. Its 44-inch height grants you significant vertical storage, and it's crafted from durable, 500D Cordura. Plus, it’s airplane-friendly, ticking the box for 100% airline compatibility. However, there's no specific section for your laptop.

The STM Grace offers 20 liters of capacity and weighs slightly less at 0.6 pounds. It has more of a horizontal spread with its 29-inch width. The Grace is designed with a 15-inch laptop sleeve and is made from 100% polyester. However, unlike the Tarahumara, this bag is less travel-friendly, only compatible with 84% of airlines.

Here's a quick comparison:

-   **Weight:** Tarahumara (0.7 pounds) vs STM Grace (0.6 pounds)
-   **Dimensions:** Tarahumara (44x24x10 inches) vs STM Grace (11x29x42 inches)
-   **Capacity:** Tarahumara (16 liters) vs STM Grace (20 liters)
-   **Material:** Tarahumara (500D Cordura) vs STM Grace (100% polyester)
-   **Laptop Compartment:** Tarahumara (None) vs STM Grace (Fits 15" laptop)
-   **Airline Compatibility:** Tarahumara (100% of airlines) vs STM Grace (84% of airlines)

Taking user reviews into account, Tarahumara shines for its durability and functionality. Reviewers testify to its impressive design, robust build, and remarkable carrying capacity, particularly given its compact exterior. It's ideal for day hiking and ensures easy access to your kit with a convenient center zip.

On the other hand, Grace charms users with its minimalistic aesthetic and practical design. The bright interior lining aids in locating items, and its internal organization is a godsend for the meticulous traveller. The inclusion of a designated laptop compartment ups its appeal. However, remember that Grace may not be the best choice if frequent flying is on your agenda. Both backpacks show a commitment to quality and user satisfaction, making them worthy contenders in the carry-on market. The decision ultimately boils down to your preferences and requirements.
