---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/c9jxve4nwa/cabin-zero-classic-pro-42l/ewr51xgkjd/thule-landmark/"
title: "Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L vs Thule Landmark"
description: "Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L vs Thule Landmark: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/c9jxve4nwa/cabin-zero-classic-pro-42l/ewr51xgkjd/thule-landmark/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L vs. Thule Landmark

# Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L vs. Thule Landmark

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/c9jxve4nwa/cabin-zero-classic-pro-42l/)

by [Cabin Zero](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cabin Zero)

![Front facing view of the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621504757/carryons/Cabin_Zero_Classic_Pro_42L_s81ww6.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>42 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>54×35×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>87%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$184</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L | Feature | Thule Landmark |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 4 | Compression | 4 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | top |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| hideable | Hip Belt | hideable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 16in |
| 2 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 1, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>600 Denier Polyester</td><td>420D Dobby polyester, bluesign approved</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Thule Landmark](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ewr51xgkjd/thule-landmark/)

by [Thule](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Thule)

![Front facing view of the Thule Landmark](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1788990443/carryons/thule-landmark-ewr51xgkjd.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>40 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×33×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>38%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$220</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L and Thule Landmark

-   **Passport pocket:** No on the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L; Top on the Thule Landmark.
-   **Luggage passthrough:** Yes on the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L; No on the Thule Landmark.
-   **Laptop sleeve:** 15in on the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L; 16in on the Thule Landmark.
-   **Main compartments:** 2 on the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L; 3 on the Thule Landmark.
-   **Built-in organizer:** Yes on the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L; No on the Thule Landmark.

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 72 accept both. 93 accept only the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L, and 0 accept only the Thule Landmark.

### Only the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L fits

Aer Lingus, Air Asia, Air Baltic, Air Canada, Air China, Air Macau, Air Malta, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, Blue Air, Brussels Airlines, Bulgaria Air, Cambodia Angkor Air, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Eastern, CommutAir, Croatia Air, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Flair Air, flybe, Garuda Indonesia, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Icelandair, InselAir, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Juneyao Airlines, Kulula, Liat Airlines, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Luxair, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Meridiana Fly, Mesa Airlines, Nordwind Airlines, Norwegian, Pakistan International, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, SAS Scandinavian, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Express, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, Trans States, TUI, Turkish Airlines, Ukraine International, United Airlines, Vietnam Airlines, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Atlantic, Volotea, Xiamen.

## Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L vs. Thule Landmark: which should you pack?

The **Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L** carries 2L more than the **Thule Landmark** (42L vs. 40L), while the **Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L** is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L** fits 87% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cabin Zero Classic Pro 42L is the better call.