---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/byuuq6pw2s/cabin-zero-urban-42l/wfrrmyi15d/ebags-luxon-rolling-travel-backpack/"
title: "Cabin Zero Urban 42L vs ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack"
description: "Cabin Zero Urban 42L vs ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/byuuq6pw2s/cabin-zero-urban-42l/wfrrmyi15d/ebags-luxon-rolling-travel-backpack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cabin Zero Urban 42L vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

# Cabin Zero Urban 42L vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cabin Zero Urban 42L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/byuuq6pw2s/cabin-zero-urban-42l/)

by [Cabin Zero](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cabin Zero)

![Front facing view of the Cabin Zero Urban 42L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621505272/carryons/Cabin_Zero_Urban_42L_yq8qth.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>42 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>51×36×15 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>82%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$155</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cabin Zero Urban 42L | Feature | ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| N | Laptop | N |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>Heavy Duty highly water resistant tarpaulin</td><td>Ballistic Nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/wfrrmyi15d/ebags-luxon-rolling-travel-backpack/)

by [Ebags](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Ebags)

![Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1623655125/carryons/Luxon_Rolling_Travel_Backpack_xotmv0.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>0 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>4.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×34×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>86%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$300</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Cabin Zero Urban 42L and ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

-   **Water bottle pockets:** No on the Cabin Zero Urban 42L; 2 on the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

Both have: backpack straps, built-in organizer, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 149 accept both. 6 accept only the Cabin Zero Urban 42L, and 14 accept only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

### Only the Cabin Zero Urban 42L fits

Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, WestJet.

### Only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air France, Air India, Air Mauritius, Boliviana de Aviacion, Cayman Airways, flybe, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Sky Airlines.

## Cabin Zero Urban 42L vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: which should you pack?

The **Cabin Zero Urban 42L** carries 42L more than the **ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack** (42L vs. 0L), while the **Cabin Zero Urban 42L** is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 4.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack** fits 86% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cabin Zero Urban 42L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cabin Zero Urban 42L is the better call.