---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/brsq4qv334/stm-trilogy/wfrrmyi15d/ebags-luxon-rolling-travel-backpack/"
title: "STM Trilogy vs ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack"
description: "STM Trilogy vs ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/brsq4qv334/stm-trilogy/wfrrmyi15d/ebags-luxon-rolling-travel-backpack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  STM Trilogy vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

# STM Trilogy vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [STM Trilogy](https://onebag.travel/carryon/brsq4qv334/stm-trilogy/)

by [Stm](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Stm)

![Front facing view of the STM Trilogy](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1634095801/carryons/STM_Trilogy_lukffj.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.64 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>46×30×16 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>94%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$80</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| STM Trilogy | Feature | ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | N |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% polyester</td><td>Ballistic Nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/wfrrmyi15d/ebags-luxon-rolling-travel-backpack/)

by [Ebags](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Ebags)

![Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1623655125/carryons/Luxon_Rolling_Travel_Backpack_xotmv0.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>0 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>4.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×34×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>86%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$300</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the STM Trilogy and ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

-   **Opening:** Top zip on the STM Trilogy; Clamshell on the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.
-   **Backpack straps:** Yes on the STM Trilogy; Hideable on the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.
-   **Laptop sleeve:** 15in on the STM Trilogy; No on the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

Both have: built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 15 accept only the STM Trilogy, and 0 accept only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

### Only the STM Trilogy fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

## STM Trilogy vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: which should you pack?

The **STM Trilogy** carries 24L more than the **ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack** (24L vs. 0L), while the **STM Trilogy** is the lighter pack at 0.64kg (vs. 4.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **STM Trilogy** fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the STM Trilogy; if you want to travel lighter, the STM Trilogy is the better call.