---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/b8qule6vgo/tolaccea-travel-backpack/o4xw0h0oz0/kore-klassics-tech-travel-pack/"
title: "Tolaccea Travel Backpack vs Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack"
description: "Tolaccea Travel Backpack vs Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/b8qule6vgo/tolaccea-travel-backpack/o4xw0h0oz0/kore-klassics-tech-travel-pack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Tolaccea Travel Backpack vs. Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack

# Tolaccea Travel Backpack vs. Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Tolaccea Travel Backpack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/b8qule6vgo/tolaccea-travel-backpack/)

![Front facing view of the Tolaccea Travel Backpack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/mzqhdifobo0cb0kp1l6m)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>45 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>51×31×21 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>72%</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Tolaccea Travel Backpack | Feature | Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| Y | Compression | N |
| 45L | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| Y | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 16in |
| 2 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1 | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Waterproof Elastic Polymer</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/o4xw0h0oz0/kore-klassics-tech-travel-pack/)

by [Kore Klassics](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Kore Klassics)

![Front facing view of the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1616994364/carryons/Kore_Klassics_Tech_Travel_Pack_q3vhjp.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>30 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.2 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>44×31×21 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>76%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$189</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Tolaccea Travel Backpack and Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack

-   **Compression straps:** Yes on the Tolaccea Travel Backpack; No on the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack.
-   **Luggage passthrough:** No on the Tolaccea Travel Backpack; Yes on the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack.
-   **Laptop sleeve:** 15in on the Tolaccea Travel Backpack; 16in on the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack.
-   **Built-in organizer:** Yes on the Tolaccea Travel Backpack; No on the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack.

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 136 accept both. 0 accept only the Tolaccea Travel Backpack, and 7 accept only the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack.

### Only the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack fits

American Eagle, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

## Tolaccea Travel Backpack vs. Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack: which should you pack?

The **Tolaccea Travel Backpack** carries 15L more than the **Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack** (45L vs. 30L), while the **Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack** is the lighter pack at 1.2kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack** fits 76% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Tolaccea Travel Backpack; if you want to travel lighter, the Kore Klassics Tech Travel Pack is the better call.
