---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/9m2od3sccp/timbuk2-blink/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/"
title: "Timbuk2 Blink vs Cotopaxi Nazca 24L (discontinued)"
description: "Timbuk2 Blink vs Cotopaxi Nazca 24L (discontinued): capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/9m2od3sccp/timbuk2-blink/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Timbuk2 Blink vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

# Timbuk2 Blink vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Timbuk2 Blink](https://onebag.travel/carryon/9m2od3sccp/timbuk2-blink/)

by [Timbuk2](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Timbuk2)

![Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Blink](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601598566/carryons/timbukblink_zzkqd5.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>54×28×10 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>88%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$140</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Timbuk2 Blink | Feature | Cotopaxi Nazca 24L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| Y | Compression |  |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 0 |
| front | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack |  |
| N | Hip Belt |  |
| N | Sternum Strap |  |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
|  | Water Bottle Holder |  |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>cotton/polyester canvas shell</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Cotopaxi Nazca 24L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/btzropojpfaic1vbeiuu)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>51×27×14 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$140</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Timbuk2 Blink and Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

-   **Passport pocket:** Front on the Timbuk2 Blink; Top on the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

Both have: laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 0 accept only the Timbuk2 Blink, and 3 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

### Only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L fits

Oman Air, Royal Jordanian, WestJet.

## Timbuk2 Blink vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L: which should you pack?

The **Timbuk2 Blink** carries the same capacity as the **Cotopaxi Nazca 24L** (24L vs. 24L), while the **Timbuk2 Blink** is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Cotopaxi Nazca 24L** fits 90% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Timbuk2 Blink; if you want to travel lighter, the Timbuk2 Blink is the better call.