---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/53yii2r1hk/waterfield-air-porter/p1vxa73t99/timbuk2-scheme/"
title: "Waterfield Air Porter vs Timbuk2 Scheme - One Bag Travel"
description: "Waterfield Air Porter vs Timbuk2 Scheme: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/53yii2r1hk/waterfield-air-porter/p1vxa73t99/timbuk2-scheme/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Waterfield Air Porter vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

# Waterfield Air Porter vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Waterfield Air Porter](https://onebag.travel/carryon/53yii2r1hk/waterfield-air-porter/)

by [Waterfield](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Waterfield)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>22 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>42×30×18 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$420</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Waterfield Air Porter | Feature | Timbuk2 Scheme |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | side |
| Y | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| removable | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 7 | Main Compartments | 6 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2, side | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>1680 Denier black Ballistic nylon</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Timbuk2 Scheme](https://onebag.travel/carryon/p1vxa73t99/timbuk2-scheme/)

by [Timbuk2](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Timbuk2)

![Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1788990446/carryons/timbuk2-scheme-p1vxa73t99.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>21 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.2 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>43×30×14 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$180</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Waterfield Air Porter and Timbuk2 Scheme

-   **Opening:** Other on the Waterfield Air Porter; Clamshell on the Timbuk2 Scheme.
-   **Passport pocket:** Top on the Waterfield Air Porter; Side on the Timbuk2 Scheme.
-   **Main compartments:** 7 on the Waterfield Air Porter; 6 on the Timbuk2 Scheme.
-   **Water bottle pockets:** 2, side on the Waterfield Air Porter; No on the Timbuk2 Scheme.

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 180 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

## Waterfield Air Porter vs. Timbuk2 Scheme: which should you pack?

The **Waterfield Air Porter** carries 1L more than the **Timbuk2 Scheme** (22L vs. 21L), while the **Timbuk2 Scheme** is the lighter pack at 1.2kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Waterfield Air Porter** fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Waterfield Air Porter; if you want to travel lighter, the Timbuk2 Scheme is the better call.