---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/3dlhnne6vf/patagonia-tres-backpack-25l/bopnm2hshc/arcido-saxon/"
title: "Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs Arcido Saxon - One Bag Travel"
description: "Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs Arcido Saxon: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/3dlhnne6vf/patagonia-tres-backpack-25l/bopnm2hshc/arcido-saxon/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Arcido Saxon

# Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Arcido Saxon

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/3dlhnne6vf/patagonia-tres-backpack-25l/)

by [Patagonia](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Patagonia)

![Front facing view of the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1632804553/carryons/Patagonia_Tres_Backpack_25L_oncsjj.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.9 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>48×31×17 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>92%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$129</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L | Feature | Arcido Saxon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester</td><td>Kodra Nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Arcido Saxon](https://onebag.travel/carryon/bopnm2hshc/arcido-saxon/)

by [Arcido](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arcido)

![Front facing view of the Arcido Saxon](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1620613973/carryons/Arcido_Saxon_vantom.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.8 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>45×33×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$119</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L and Arcido Saxon

-   **Backpack straps:** Hideable on the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L; Yes on the Arcido Saxon.
-   **Built-in organizer:** Yes on the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L; No on the Arcido Saxon.

Both have: luggage passthrough, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L, and 5 accept only the Arcido Saxon.

### Only the Arcido Saxon fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska.

## Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Arcido Saxon: which should you pack?

The **Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L** carries the same capacity as the **Arcido Saxon** (25L vs. 25L), while the **Arcido Saxon** is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Arcido Saxon** fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Saxon is the better call.