---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/2ejwt5vraf/trakke-stor/xz50uzw3hb/arcteryx-blade-28/"
title: "Trakke Stor vs Arc'teryx Blade 28 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Trakke Stor vs Arc'teryx Blade 28: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/2ejwt5vraf/trakke-stor/xz50uzw3hb/arcteryx-blade-28/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Trakke Stor vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28

# Trakke Stor vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Trakke Stor](https://onebag.travel/carryon/2ejwt5vraf/trakke-stor/)

by [Trakke](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Trakke)

![Front facing view of the Trakke Stor](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601579706/carryons/trakke_wcngmr.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>30 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>49×34×19 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>91%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$350</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Trakke Stor | Feature | Arc'teryx Blade 28 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | back |
| N | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 4 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>Waxed canvas</td><td>N210p-HT nylon 6,6 N630p-HT nylon 6,6</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Arc'teryx Blade 28](https://onebag.travel/carryon/xz50uzw3hb/arcteryx-blade-28/)

by [Arc'teryx](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arc'teryx)

![Front facing view of the Arc'teryx Blade 28](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1600726552/carryons/arcterixblade_ybynth.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>28 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>54×31×16 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>88%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$160</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Trakke Stor and Arc'teryx Blade 28

-   **Passport pocket:** Front on the Trakke Stor; Back on the Arc'teryx Blade 28.
-   **Luggage passthrough:** No on the Trakke Stor; Yes on the Arc'teryx Blade 28.
-   **Main compartments:** 3 on the Trakke Stor; 4 on the Arc'teryx Blade 28.
-   **Built-in organizer:** No on the Trakke Stor; Yes on the Arc'teryx Blade 28.

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 6 accept only the Trakke Stor, and 0 accept only the Arc'teryx Blade 28.

### Only the Trakke Stor fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian, WestJet.

## Trakke Stor vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28: which should you pack?

The **Trakke Stor** carries 2L more than the **Arc'teryx Blade 28** (30L vs. 28L), while the **Trakke Stor** is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Trakke Stor** fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Trakke Stor; if you want to travel lighter, the Trakke Stor is the better call.