---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/1c7xjawdxz/fjallraven-high-coast-totepack/582qou1tq7/osprey-arcane-small-day/"
title: "Fjallraven High Coast Totepack vs Osprey Arcane Small Day"
description: "Fjallraven High Coast Totepack vs Osprey Arcane Small Day: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/1c7xjawdxz/fjallraven-high-coast-totepack/582qou1tq7/osprey-arcane-small-day/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Fjallraven High Coast Totepack vs. Osprey Arcane Small Day

# Fjallraven High Coast Totepack vs. Osprey Arcane Small Day

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Fjallraven High Coast Totepack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/1c7xjawdxz/fjallraven-high-coast-totepack/)

by [Fjallraven](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Fjallraven)

![Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1624871712/carryons/Fjallraven_High_Coast_Totepack_izqq0d.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>23 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>40×31×14 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>96%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$90</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Fjallraven High Coast Totepack | Feature | Osprey Arcane Small Day |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | front |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| removable | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 14in | Laptop | 14in |
| 2 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | N |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>Bergshell®: 400D 100% polyamide (recycled) Produced without PFAS</td><td>bluesign® APPROVED, 100% recycled 480D polyester, DWR treatment made without PFAS</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Osprey Arcane Small Day](https://onebag.travel/carryon/582qou1tq7/osprey-arcane-small-day/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>12 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>39×27×17 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>99%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$100</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack and Osprey Arcane Small Day

-   **Opening:** Top zip on the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack; Clamshell on the Osprey Arcane Small Day.
-   **Backpack straps:** Removable on the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack; Yes on the Osprey Arcane Small Day.
-   **Built-in organizer:** No on the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack; Yes on the Osprey Arcane Small Day.
-   **Water resistant:** Yes on the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack; No on the Osprey Arcane Small Day.

Both have: passport pocket, laptop sleeve.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 181 accept both. 0 accept only the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack, and 6 accept only the Osprey Arcane Small Day.

### Only the Osprey Arcane Small Day fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, Wizz Air.

## Fjallraven High Coast Totepack vs. Osprey Arcane Small Day: which should you pack?

The **Fjallraven High Coast Totepack** carries 11L more than the **Osprey Arcane Small Day** (23L vs. 12L), while the **Fjallraven High Coast Totepack** is the lighter pack at 0.4kg (vs. 0.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Osprey Arcane Small Day** fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven High Coast Totepack is the better call.
