---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/srjwfb9991/deuter-trans-alpine-32-el/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/srjwfb9991/deuter-trans-alpine-32-el/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | N |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | Y |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>210D PA, 600D PES</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL](https://onebag.travel/carryon/srjwfb9991/deuter-trans-alpine-32-el/)

by [Deuter](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Deuter)

![Front facing view of the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621827238/carryons/Deuter_Trans_Alpine_32_EL_h6kzib.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>32 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.26 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>58×28×24 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$150</td></tr></tbody></table>

At first glance, the Osprey Porter 46 and the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL are both exemplary choices for carry-on backpacks. They showcase design excellence consistent with each brand's industry reputation. But upon closer inspection, the Porter 46 by Osprey emerges as a more spacious lifter, boasting 46 liters in capacity, while its Deuter counterpart sits at a commendable but smaller 32 liters. This extra space comes in handy when packing bulky gear or just needing that extra room for souvenirs on the way back from an expedition.

-   **Size and weight**: The Osprey Porter 46 is slightly wider and deeper but less tall compared to the Deuter Trans Alpine 32. Additionally, the Porter 46 sits heavier at 1.5 lbs, while the Trans Alpine weighs 1.26 lbs.
-   **Capacity**: Porter 46 offers 46 liters of storage capacity, outstripping Trans Alpine's 32 liters.
-   **Airline compatibility**: Osprey Porter 46 is compatible with 47% of airlines, beating out Deuter Trans Alpine 32, compatible with only 30%.
-   **Material**: The Porter 46 is made of durable Nylon while the Trans Alpine is comprised of 210D PA and 600D PES.

The Porter 46 is the go-to bag for urban adventurers according to enthusiastic reviewers. Not surprising, thanks to its ingenious features like a clamshell opening for efficient packing, a durable build to withstand rough handling, and compression straps to keep things neat. Plus, its spacious interior and good suspension gives you a considerably comfortable carry.

Contrary to this, the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL takes a more minimalistic approach. It is compact, a quality mirrored in its considerably less capacity that some might find less appealing. However, it outranks the Porter 46 on lightness - an essential factor for those on lengthy hikes or biking trails. Unfortunately, for tech enthusiasts, this backpack fails to deliver - it does not provide a dedicated laptop compartment. Both backpacks encourage travel, yet your decision lies in assessing practicality. Buy the Osprey Porter 46 if high-capacity, airline friendliness, and a laptop compartment are your priorities. Choose the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL for its decreased footprint and weight.