---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/r3633be2os/deuter-trans-alpine-30/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Deuter Trans Alpine 30 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Deuter Trans Alpine 30 carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/r3633be2os/deuter-trans-alpine-30/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Trans Alpine 30

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Trans Alpine 30

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Deuter Trans Alpine 30 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | 4 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | front |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | N |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 4 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>210D PA, 600D PES</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Deuter Trans Alpine 30](https://onebag.travel/carryon/r3633be2os/deuter-trans-alpine-30/)

by [Deuter](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Deuter)

![Front facing view of the Deuter Trans Alpine 30](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621826571/carryons/Deuter_Trans_Alpine_30_uchrzw.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>30 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>53×28×24 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>40%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$170</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Osprey Porter 46 from renowned outdoors company, Osprey, is a versatile piece of gear that brings a lot to the table. Measuring 23 inches tall, 36 inches wide, and 56 inches in depth, it's a solid choice for the serious traveller. The bag offers a generous 46 litres of capacity, comfortably fitting all your needed items with room to spare. Quality is assured with it's heavy-duty nylon construction. Intriguingly, it houses a laptop compartment designed for a laptop size of up to 1 inch, showing that it is a bag that takes into consideration the needs of a modern traveller.

Conversely, the Deuter Trans Alpine 30 by Deuter, another well-known backpack manufacturer, offers its own unique features. Slightly taller at 24 inches, but narrower at 28 inches wide and 54 inches deep, it's a good fit for those favouring a more streamlined bag. It weighs marginally less at 1.23 pounds but holds less with a 30 litre capacity. Made from robust 210D PA and 600D PES, it provides a durable pack for heavy-duty use. Curiously, it lacks any laptop compartment – a significant drawback for some.

Comparison points:

-   Size: The Osprey Porter is larger in both dimensions and volume capacity.
-   Weight: The Trans Alpine 30 is slightly lighter.
-   Material Composition: The Porter uses nylon, while the Trans Alpine utilizes a PA and PES mix.
-   Laptop Compartment: The Porter has a laptop compartment while the Trans Alpine does not.

Both bags fit the same percentage of airline compatibility at 47%. These differences show that personal preference factors into the decision making process. Some might favour the Porter 46 for its generous packing space and laptop compartment, making it a more versatile bag for many scenarios. On the other hand, some might veer towards the Trans Alpine 30 for its lighter weight and narrower dimensions, viewing it as a more user-friendly bag for specific needs. Whatever the choice, they both offer quality construction and multiple storage options, proving that neither is a lackluster choice. Happy trails!