---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/pf7vbutynt/cotopaxi-cusco-backpack-26l/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/pf7vbutynt/cotopaxi-cusco-backpack-26l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>100% repurposed 600D polyester</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/pf7vbutynt/cotopaxi-cusco-backpack-26l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621511060/carryons/Cotopaxi_Cusco_Backpack_26L_hu2bah.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>26 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>53×33×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>70%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$110</td></tr></tbody></table>

The **Osprey Porter 46** and **Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L** are two fantastic choices for the savvy traveller. Both offer significant storage capabilities, a myriad of functionalities, and are compact enough for comfortable carry. However, despite their shared qualities, they also exhibit noticeable differences, each with its own merits.

**Osprey Porter 46** is a larger pack with a sizable 46-liter capacity. It's a generous option for those who pack slightly more, made of durable Nylon, and manages the weight with its robust build. It boasts a laptop compartment for a 17-inch laptop and is compatible with 47% of airlines. However, at 1.5 pounds it is comparatively heavier. The **Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L** is made from 100% repurposed 600D polyester, it is impressively lightweight at 0.7 pounds. With a capacity of 26 liters and a smaller laptop compartment suitable for a 15-inch laptop, it is more compact compared to the Porter. But, it is also compatible with more airlines, at 65%.

-   **Size and Weight:** The Porter is larger with a weight of 1.5 pounds compared to the Cotopaxi's lighter 0.7 pounds.
-   **Capacity:** The Porter carries more at 46 liters against Cotopaxi's 26 liters.
-   **Materials:** The Porter is made of sturdy Nylon, while Cusco uses eco-friendly 100% repurposed Polyester.
-   **Laptop Compartment:** Porter carries a larger 17-inch laptop, while Cusco accommodates a more standard 15-inch laptop.
-   **Airlines Compatibility:** Cusco leads here with a 65% compatibility rate compared to Porter's 47%.

On the ground, reviewers have expressed awe for the **Osprey Porter 46**'s functionality and durable build. It's excellent for urban travellers, comfortable, and is able to shrug off all sorts of rough handling. On the other hand, the **Cusco 26L** is lauded as an everyday work bag, with delightful features and a minimalistic, tight design. It's functional, protective, and significantly lighter.

In conclusion, choosing between the **Osprey Porter 46** and **Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L** ultimately boils down to your personal needs and preferences. If you require durability and extra space, Porter fits the bill; its higher price reflects its quality and capability. Conversely, for those who value lightness, compatibility, and sustainability, the Cusco serves perfectly at an economically sound price. It’s your call - bigger horse, or swifter pony?