---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/p94sibqij4/kifaru-antero/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Kifaru Antero - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Kifaru Antero carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/p94sibqij4/kifaru-antero/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Kifaru Antero

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Kifaru Antero

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Kifaru Antero |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | 2 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | top |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>500 Denier Cordura Lined with 400 D packcloth</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Kifaru Antero](https://onebag.travel/carryon/p94sibqij4/kifaru-antero/)

by [Kifaru](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Kifaru)

![Front facing view of the Kifaru Antero](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601079208/carryons/antero_xtu6qh.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>48×25×15 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>93%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$415</td></tr></tbody></table>

Osprey and Kifaru are both leaders in the backpack manufacturing domain, known for their durable and functional products. The Osprey Porter 46 and the Kifaru Antero are two of their top carry-on backpacks, and these gems have some notable differences. The Porter 46, true to its name, has a volume capacity of 46 liters which outpaces the Antero's 24.5 liters. Though it's larger, it's not heftier; the Porter 46 is slightly heavier by mere 0.1 pounds at 1.5 pounds, while Antero comes in at 1.4 pounds.

Here's a brief punchlist of their differentiators:

-   Dimensions: Porter 46 is 23" tall, 36" wide, and 56" deep while Antero is 49" tall, 26" wide, and 16" deep.
-   Material: Porter 46 is made of nylon while Antero is composed of 500 Denier Cordura lined with 400 D packcloth.
-   Airline Compatibility: Porter 46 is compatible with 47% of airlines, whereas Antero boasts 99% compatibility.
-   Laptop Compartment: The laptop space in Porter 46 accommodates up to a 17-inch laptop compared to the Antero's 15-inch limit.

Professional reviews nail down key features and utility for each backpack. For example, a reviewer praised the Porter 46 for its high capacity, durability, and versatility of use as a backpack or a duffel. Meanwhile, the Antero won accolades for its organizational amenities, comfortable back panel, and the convenience of quick access zippers for the main compartment.

So while the Porter 46 from Osprey may be preferable for those with a higher volume of carry-ons and need for versatility, the Antero from Kifaru might appeal more to those focusing on organization and wider airline compatibility. Ultimately, the choice between these two robust carry-on options will narrow down to individual preferences and usage needs. But no matter what you opt for, both of these packs will prove to be sturdy companions for your journeys.