---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/gpfbufuba2/osprey-flapjack/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Osprey Flapjack - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Osprey Flapjack carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/gpfbufuba2/osprey-flapjack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Osprey Flapjack

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Osprey Flapjack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Osprey Flapjack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression |  |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 0 |
| top | Passport | side |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap |  |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder |  |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>600D Polyspun</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Osprey Flapjack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/gpfbufuba2/osprey-flapjack/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Flapjack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601576342/carryons/c9e6c91c-b836-4c78-a9ed-c452b3ce9d5a_rsb3j2.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>21 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.9 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>49×34×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>72%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$110</td></tr></tbody></table>

Looking at two esteemed adversaries in the carry-on backpack game, the Osprey Porter 46 and the Osprey Flapjack possess unique features catering to different user needs.

Starting with the Osprey Porter 46, its primary selling point is its larger 46-liter capacity, dwarfing its comparison, the 21-liter Osprey Flapjack. Though larger, it retains its portability with dimensions of 23"H, 36"W, and 56"D, and a weight of 1.5 pounds. The Porter 46 is built to handle the rough and tumble of travel, made of sturdy nylon and featuring a laptop compartment that holds a 1-inch laptop. However, it falls behind in airline compatibility, being suitable for only 47% of airlines.

Contrastingly, the Flapjack is your perfect travel buddy, compatible with 98% of airlines. Though smaller at 21 liters, it competes in the space race with dimensions of 49"H, 34"W, and 23"D, and weighs only 0.9 pounds. The Flapjack is 600D Polyspun, an arguably stronger fiber, and is geared towards tech-savvy travelers with a laptop compartment accommodating a 15-inch laptop.

-   **Size**: Porter 46 (46 litres, 23"HX36"WX56"D) Vs Flapjack (21 litres, 49"HX34"WX23"D)
-   **Weight**: Porter 46 (1.5 lbs) Vs Flapjack (0.9 lbs)
-   **Material**: Porter 46 (Nylon) Vs Flapjack (600D Polyspun)
-   **Laptop Compartment**: Porter 46 (1 inch laptop) Vs Flapjack (15 inch laptop)
-   **Airline Compatibility**: Porter 46 (47%) Vs Flapjack (98%)

When it comes to reviews, the Porter 46 garners praise for its capacious storage, durability, and the convenience of its clamshell opening. Moreover, for a bag of its size, it is considered lightweight, thus maximizing comfort for the user. It also offers good suspension, keeping your belongings safe and secure.

In conclusion, both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Osprey Flapjack offer distinct advantages depending on the user's needs. If you are a minimalist traveler who puts priority on lightweight and universal airline compatibility, the Flapjack fits the bill. But if you're someone who prefers bigger storage space, durability, and laptop protection, the Porter 46 will suit you best. The decision ultimately relies on your type of travel and personal preferences.