---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/g9xaty0zdu/deuter-gogo/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Deuter Gogo - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Deuter Gogo carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/g9xaty0zdu/deuter-gogo/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Gogo

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Gogo

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Deuter Gogo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop |  |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | optional |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>300D PES Ripstop</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Deuter Gogo](https://onebag.travel/carryon/g9xaty0zdu/deuter-gogo/)

by [Deuter](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Deuter)

![Front facing view of the Deuter Gogo](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621567162/carryons/Deuter_Gogo_ynmi6s.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.59 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>46×30×21 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>75%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$77</td></tr></tbody></table>

Shouldering the burden of a good carry-on bag requires a closer look into what your voyage necessities entail. The Osprey Porter 46 is a beast of a bag that embraces volume. It swallows 46 liters of your gear and compactly cradles it in nylon comfort. With the assurance of 47% airline compatibility, it offers practicality for most airline regulations. The Porter 46 is hefty yet poised with a streamlined profile, and a niche for your laptop within its confines. The reviewers seem to laud this mid-sized marvel for its durability and astute design.

Now, meet the Deuter Gogo. This bag comes across as a featherweight competitor tipping the scales at a frugal 0.59 pounds. It's fashionably crafted from 300D PES Ripstop fabric, adding resilience to its bijou size. It rations your gear into a judicious 25 liters of space while promising acceptance by 67% of airlines, heightening the chance of trouble-free airplane stowage. Even though it lacks a laptop compartment, the Deuter Gogo retains a compact allure and apparent ease of portability.

## Comparing Bullet Points:

-   Dimensions: The Osprey Porter 46 is larger in volume (46 liters, 23in tall, 36in wide and 56in deep) compared to the smaller Deuter Gogo (25 liters, 21in tall, 30in wide and46in deep).
-   Weight: The Osprey Porter is heavier (1.5 pounds) while the Deuter Gogo is significantly lighter (0.59 pounds).
-   Material: The Osprey Porter is fashioned from Nylon, whereas the Deuter Gogo sports a 300D PES Ripstop material.
-   Utility: While the Osprey Porter possesses a laptop compartment, the Deuter Gogo does not.
-   Airline Compatibility: Deuter Gogo (67%) has a higher airline compatibility rate compared to the Osprey Porter 46 (47%).

Picking a carry-on needs consideration beyond mere convenience. With the Osprey Porter 46, you lean towards a roomier, thoughtfully designed bag that takes on more. It's company along adventures that demand more from your carry-on.

Turning to the Deuter Gogo, you place a bet on a lighter, smaller pack. It’s a suitable choice for those with more minimalist travel needs. Its material durability is matched by its superior compliance with airline regulations. As an amenable companion in the cab overhead compartment, the Deuter Gogo holds up its own in this comparative discussion.