---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/dfuf8t14wl/fjallraven-greenland-top/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Fjallraven Greenland Top - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Fjallraven Greenland Top carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/dfuf8t14wl/fjallraven-greenland-top/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Greenland Top

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Greenland Top

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Fjallraven Greenland Top |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 3 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Fjallraven Greenland Top](https://onebag.travel/carryon/dfuf8t14wl/fjallraven-greenland-top/)

by [Fjallraven](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Fjallraven)

![Front facing view of the Fjallraven Greenland Top](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1624363273/carryons/Fjallraven_Greenland_Top_fg31z9.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>43×26×15 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>96%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$120</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Osprey Porter 46 and the Fjallraven Greenland Top are both top contenders in the realm of carry-on backpacks. Each has its own unique strengths and features that make it a worthy contender. Let's delve a bit deeper into the nitty-gritty of these well-crafted backpacks.

The Osprey Porter 46 is sizeable with a capacity of 46 liters, whereas the Fjallraven Greenland Top is a tad bit smaller at 20 liters. This large capacity bag by Osprey weights well at 1.5 pounds, while Fjallraven has the edge in lightness weighing only 0.7 pounds. Material used in both bags differ too; Osprey opts for nylon while Fjallraven goes for the composite G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S. When it comes to airline compatibility the Greenland Top wins hands down at 84% compatibility, trumping the Porter 46's 47%.

-   Size: Porter 46 measures 23x56x36 inches; Greenland Top smaller at 15x43x26 inches.
-   Weight: Osprey Porter 46 tips the scales at 1.5 pounds; Fjallraven Greenland Top lighter at 0.7 pounds.
-   Material: Porter 46 is crafted from Nylon; Greenland Top made of G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton.
-   Laptop compartment: Osprey accommodates a 1-inch laptop; Fjallraven fits a 15-inch laptop.
-   Airline compatibility: Porter 46 compatible with only 47% of airlines; Greenland Top is the winner at 84%.

Testimonials all agree on one thing: these bags are well-crafted marvels of the backpack world. Reviewers of the Osprey Porter 46 praise it as a durable, spacious bag excellent for urban travelers and outdoorsy folks alike, with features like efficient organization, flexibility, and a great value at $140. Conversely, the Fjallraven Greenland Top earns commendations for its casual, classic design balanced with modern functionality, comfortable strapping, and subtle pocket designs.

In conclusion, the choice between the Osprey Porter 46 and the Fjallraven Greenland Top largely depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you need more carrying capacity and intend to haul your gear around, the Porter 46 might be the right fit for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lightweight, versatile bag with a high degree of airline compatibility, the Greenland Top can be your best pick. Both backpacks are praised for their comfort, durability, and overall quality, so you can't go wrong with either option.