---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/d61jrhnw5u/fjallraven-vardag-25/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Fjallraven Vardag 25 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Fjallraven Vardag 25 carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/d61jrhnw5u/fjallraven-vardag-25/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Vardag 25

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Vardag 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Fjallraven Vardag 25 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | N |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Fjallraven Vardag 25](https://onebag.travel/carryon/d61jrhnw5u/fjallraven-vardag-25/)

by [Fjallraven](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Fjallraven)

![Front facing view of the Fjallraven Vardag 25](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1624889236/carryons/Fjallraven_Vardag_25_eya3tc.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.48 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>43×31×14.5 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$80</td></tr></tbody></table>

# Osprey Porter 46 Vs Fjallraven Vardag 25

When it comes to carry-on backpacks, two heavy hitters approach the front of the lineup: The durable and capacious Osprey Porter 46 and the light yet sturdy Fjallraven Vardag 25. The Osprey Porter 46 is no lightweight when it comes to size, boasting 46 liters of capacity and weighing in at 1.5 pounds. However, it's not the bag to choose if you're a frequent flyer, with compatibility at only 47% of airlines. The bag majorly makes up for this with its features, such as a spacious laptop compartment and a sturdy nylon construction.

The Fjallraven Vardag 25, on the other hand, proves that size is not everything. This backpack's 25-liter capacity is compatible with a remarkable 84% of airlines, making it an excellent choice for those constantly on the go. Weighing only 0.48 pounds, it is made from G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton material—reliable and eco-friendly.

-   **Size**: Osprey Porter 46 is larger
-   **Weight**: Fjallraven Vardag 25 is lighter
-   **Capacity**: Osprey Porter 46 holds more
-   **Airline Compatibility**: Fjallraven Vardag 25 wins
-   **Material**: Each has its benefits—nylon for durability (Osprey), eco-friendly material for Vardag
-   **Laptop compartment**: Only the Osprey Porter 46 offers this

Multiple reviews highlight the benefits of the Osprey Porter. Reviewers note its large capacity, durability, and the ability to bulk it up or cinch it down. Others commend its gear-carrying capacity and smart features designed with the urban traveler in mind. The Porter's backpacker aesthetic also receives favorable remarks. The marketing spin labels it comfortable, solid, and capable of withstanding whatever you throw at it.

On the flipside, the Fjallraven Vardag 25 does not go unnoticed. It comes with a foam seat pad and promises comfort in using as it is typical of most Fjallraven bags. Reviewers also appreciate its simplistic, minimalist look that could fit most situations and environments. Its construction from durable and eco-friendly material also deserves applause. Every backpack carries its own merits, and the choice between these two ultimately rests on personal preference and travel needs.