---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/bopnm2hshc/arcido-saxon/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Arcido Saxon - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Arcido Saxon carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/bopnm2hshc/arcido-saxon/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Arcido Saxon

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Arcido Saxon

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Arcido Saxon |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>Kodra Nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Arcido Saxon](https://onebag.travel/carryon/bopnm2hshc/arcido-saxon/)

by [Arcido](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arcido)

![Front facing view of the Arcido Saxon](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1620613973/carryons/Arcido_Saxon_vantom.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.8 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>45×33×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$119</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Osprey Porter 46 backpack and Arcido Saxon backpack are both durable choices for travel, yet they serve quite different purposes. The Porter 46, constructed from robust nylon and standing tall at 23 inches high, is the larger of the two; it's certainly not a pack to be taken lightly with its weight of 1.5 pounds. It's a backpack designed with the long-term wanderer in mind, offering a substantial 46-litre capacity, but this comes at the cost of airline compatibility. The Porter is suitable for use with only 47% of airlines.

Conversely, the Arcido Saxon, with its unique Kodra Nylon, is more suitable for the light traveller. It's more compact, standing at 20 inches high and weighing a mere 0.8 pounds, half the weight of the Porter. It has less capacity, of course, coming in at 25 litres, but this is more than adequately balanced by its airport friendliness; the Saxon is compatible with 83% of airlines.

-   **Dimensions**: The Porter 46 is overall larger than the Arcido Saxon.
-   **Weight**: The Arcido Saxon is almost half the weight of the Porter 46.
-   **Capacity**: The Porter 46 offers almost double the capacity than the Saxon.
-   **Compatibility with Airlines**: The Saxon comes out on top, compatible with 83% of airlines compared to the Porter's 47%.
-   **Material**: Whilst both are made of nylon, the Saxon uses a distinct Kodra Nylon.
-   **Laptop Compartment**: The Porter 46 can fit a slightly larger laptop than the Saxon.

The Porter 46 seems to be a go-to option for many reviewers due to its substantial capacity and durability. Many also praised it for its 'gear-hauling' capabilities, hinting at the tough construction of the pack. The Porter 46 is commended for its smart features, apparently designed with the urban traveller in mind, and its build quality is also frequently highlighted. However, the overall size of the Porter 46 seems to be a love-it-or-hate-it kind of deal, with some finding it too bulky.

On the other hand, the Saxon is commended for its lightweight and flexible design, making it an optimal choice for shorter trips or daily use. Its excellent organization capability is highly praised among users, with one reviewer stating it as the most organized backpack they’ve ever owned. Yet, when compared to the Porter, the Saxon simply carries less. Your choice rests with your needs; both backpacks prove themselves to be more than capable.