---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/9jo001afhl/exped-metro-20/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus Exped Metro 20 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and Exped Metro 20 carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/9jo001afhl/exped-metro-20/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. Exped Metro 20

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. Exped Metro 20

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Exped Metro 20 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>600 D ripstop polyester, PU coated, 1'200 mm water column</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Exped Metro 20](https://onebag.travel/carryon/9jo001afhl/exped-metro-20/)

by [Exped](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Exped)

![Front facing view of the Exped Metro 20](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1623861489/carryons/Exped_Metro_20_bdlg25.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.72 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>50×28×17 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>92%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$99</td></tr></tbody></table>

We've got two contenders on the table today. One is the Osprey Porter 46, a nylon giant known for its large capacity and impressive versatility. Its dimensions chalk up to 23 inches in height, 36 inches in width, and 56 inches in depth; a bulk that allows it to swallow up 46 liters worth of your precious cargo. But it's not all about size; this rucksack is featherweight at 1.5 pounds, your back won't be complaining about carrying it around all day. On the other hand, its compatibility with airlines (47%) does show that size comes with limitations.

Now let's shift our eyes to the Exped Metro 20. Crafted from 600 D ripstop polyester with PU coating and a 1200 mm water column, this thing is a tank on the durability front. It is a bit on the compact side, with dimensions of 17 inches in height, 28 inches in width, and 50 inches in depth, and a holding capacity of 20 liters. However, it breezes past the Porter in terms of weight, tipping the scales at a mere 0.72 pounds, and its compatibility with 81% of airlines.

Here's a quick comparison rundown for convenience:

-   **Dimensions**: The Porter stands taller, wider, deeper.
-   **Weight**: The Metro bags the trophy, half the weight of the Porter.
-   **Capacity**: The Porter takes this one with more than double the Metro's volume.
-   **Airlines Compatibility**: Metro knocks this one out the park with significantly higher acceptance rate.
-   **Material**: Let's call this a draw, considering the Metro's rigorous and durable material and the Porter's tried and true nylon.
-   **Laptop Compartment Size**: Porter leads again with space for a larger laptop.

The reviews for both backpacks are glowing and highlight their respective strengths. The Porter is loved for its ample storage space and supportive suspension system, while the Metro receives praise for its sleek design and environmental sustainability. Travelers seem to appreciate the Porter's clamshell opening, and the ability to stuff it with gear, while the Metro's clean layout and separate laptop compartment have won hearts on the daily commute.

In the end, both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Exped Metro 20 are high-quality backpacks with their unique strengths. The Porter appears the better pick for the wilderness-loving adventurers in need of space, while the Metro might be the choice for those prioritizing lightweight, compact design for urban commuting. Your preferences and needs will ultimately dictate which of these two excellent backpacks is the right wingman for your adventures.