---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/2w47b6jjkh/goruck-gr2-40/"
title: "Osprey Porter 46 versus GORUCK GR2 40 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Osprey Porter 46 and GORUCK GR2 40 carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/2w47b6jjkh/goruck-gr2-40/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Porter 46 vs. GORUCK GR2 40

# Osprey Porter 46 vs. GORUCK GR2 40

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Porter 46](https://onebag.travel/carryon/02bc32de-b553-463a-a455-177400d5423d/osprey-porter-46/)

by [Osprey](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Osprey)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/bus8myci54gl3byfegrn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>46 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.5 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×36×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$185</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | GORUCK GR2 40 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | front |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 17in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR</td><td>1000D Cordura w/ 210D Back Panel</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [GORUCK GR2 40](https://onebag.travel/carryon/2w47b6jjkh/goruck-gr2-40/)

by [GORUCK](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=GORUCK)

![Front facing view of the GORUCK GR2 40](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/y7tjdzdlsvb7uf9lo3r7)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>40 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>2 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×32×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>47%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$395</td></tr></tbody></table>

Both the Osprey Porter 46 and the GORUCK GR2 40 serve their purpose as carry on backpacks, fit well for seasoned travelers. The Porter 46, true to its name, offers a sizable volume of 46 liters, providing an ample room for storing belongings. Weighing 1.5 pounds and comprised predominantly of Nylon, this backpack suits those who appreciate lightweight travel. A unique feature of the Porter 46 is a laptop compartment that can snugly fit a laptop of up to 1 inch. Analyzing its airline compatibility, it is compatible with 47% of airlines, which is worthy of noting.

On the flip side, the GORUCK GR2 40, though slightly smaller in capacity (40 liters), offers a robust and tough build, weighing 2.2 pounds. It is made of Special Forces Grade 1000D CORDURA®, a material renowned for its strength and longevity. It accommodates a laptop of up to 17 inches in its special compartment, quite a jump from the Porter 46's capabilities. Its compatibility with airlines is impressive, with a 97% matching rate.

-   Comparison Bullet Points:
    -   Both backpacks are of similar height, but the Porter 46 is wider and deeper than the GR2 40.
    -   The Porter 46 is lighter in weight, whereas the GR2 40 is heavier but more robust in construction.
    -   The Porter 46 offers more capacity (46 liters), while the GR2 40 offers less (40 liters).
    -   The Porter 46 accommodates a smaller laptop compared to the GR2 40.
    -   The GR2 40 holds a significant advantage in compatibility with airlines.

While reviewers praise the Porter 46 for its spaciousness, the GR2 40 gets high remarks for its durability and robust nature. The former has commendations for its fast and convenient packing due to its clamshell opening and its efficient compression strap leading to a neat pack. On the other hand, reviewers applaud the GR2 40's customizable MOLLE webbing and exceptional organization in the front pocket.

In conclusion, both backpacks have their own exclusive features and capabilities. If you value size, lightweight, and simplicity, then the Porter 46 may be your perfect fit. But if you prefer strength, functionality, and a high compatibility with airlines, then the GORUCK GR2 40 would be your ideal choice.
